teidesu
|
ae2dbcf03f
|
build: fixed scripts, eslintignore, fixed linter warnings and re-formatted with prettier
|
2021-06-06 15:20:41 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
2cd443d6d1
|
feat(client): string sessions
|
2021-06-05 20:25:08 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
68ea4080df
|
feat(core): handle AUTH_KEY_UNREGISTERED error
|
2021-06-05 18:56:43 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
60162c88bc
|
fix(client): avoid redundant help.getConfig call
|
2021-05-24 23:03:29 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
1c4d9c1ab3
|
feat(core): change transport at runtime
|
2021-05-23 13:35:03 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
c228085bfe
|
feat(client): improved min peers and short updates handling
|
2021-05-22 14:41:11 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
4852fe0301
|
feat(core): support rpc timeouts
|
2021-05-16 02:52:13 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
97ba7652ff
|
refactor: use constructor check instead of instanceof where possible
this might just have introduced a bunch of errors, but ill test later
|
2021-05-15 21:17:49 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
9be7b0d6c9
|
refactor: prefer switches to else-if chains
|
2021-05-12 17:58:45 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
d841188149
|
fix(core): only switch dc for primary connection
|
2021-05-05 18:24:16 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
23dcc4c1e5
|
feat: support for chosen inline query results
|
2021-05-04 14:07:40 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
5fee1d0660
|
fix(client): better storage handling
i suppose?? i mean, it's definitely better than randomly losing updates state and entities, but this might be much slower?
|
2021-04-26 23:26:29 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
77ab185493
|
fix(core): properly handle WORKER_BUSY_TOO_LONG_RETRY error
|
2021-04-24 20:13:36 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
87481c9a32
|
rewrite(client): improved updates handling, added support for min entities
|
2021-04-18 16:23:25 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
0b361d0b8d
|
refactor(core): moved storage load&save to methods to allow overriding logic in subclasses
|
2021-04-17 18:56:51 +03:00 |
|
teidesu
|
cd8ec8309f
|
Initial commit
|
2021-04-08 12:19:38 +03:00 |
|